Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Wieck) writes:
> >> As long as you brought it up: how sure are you that the method you've
> >> used is not subject to any patents?
>
> > Now that you ask for it: I'm not sure. Could be.
>
> >> If you can show that this method uses no ideas not found in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Wieck) writes:
>> As long as you brought it up: how sure are you that the method you've
>> used is not subject to any patents?
> Now that you ask for it: I'm not sure. Could be.
>> If you can show that this method uses no ideas not found in zlib,
>> then I'll feel reas
Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > One thing to keep in mind is that the LZ algorithm you're
> > thinking of must be distributable under the terms of the BSD
> > license. If it's copyrighted or patented by any third party,
> > not agreeing to these te
