[SQL] Re: Boolean and Bit

2001-01-17 Thread Keith Gray
Josh Berkus wrote: > > > The solution to this is not to use BLOBs, but rather to use file system > handles for the location of the binary data on the server. This way, > all you need is DOS-to-UNIX and UNIX-to-DOS translation for the > filesystem handles, something easily accomplished through >

Re: [SQL] Re: Boolean and Bit

2001-01-17 Thread Josh Berkus
Josh Berkus wrote: > Well, yes. This is beacause BLOBs are NOT part of the SQL > standard and IMHO a bad idea relationally; thus their > implementation is entirely proprietary to the RDBMS. The > solution is not to use BLOBs. Ooops. Let me re-state: This is because the *implementation* of BL

[SQL] Re: Boolean and Bit

2001-01-16 Thread Josh Berkus
Keith, > This is a compatibility issue. While I prefer to use > BOOLEAN, this is SQL3 > and not available on the (unfortunately must use) > MS-SQL/MSDE platform. > > My options are to use a CHAR field and re-write my code > for "T" and "F" or > an int field and re-write my code to use "field=0"