Josh Berkus wrote:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant
> commercial entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.
> Since I'm often foggy on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92
> spec definitions of things, I thought I'd post it for feedback here:
T
Tom,
> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?
Ok, talked with him. They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3
programming language
Tom,
> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?
I'll ask, but I'm not sure that I can. The particular company is very
bureaucratic, an
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant commercial
> entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.
This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilit
Folks,
Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant commercial
entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.Since I'm often foggy
on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92 spec definitions of things, I
thought I'd post it for feedback here:
1) SQL-92 SELECT,
