Alvaro Nunes Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed what i think is a weird behaviour with SRFs. When I use them
> in a SELECT clause, and the SRF returns no rows, the query returns no
> rows too, when I think it should return an a null column.
Why would you think that? The behavior is exac
Hi,
I noticed what i think is a weird behaviour with SRFs. When I use them
in a SELECT clause, and the SRF returns no rows, the query returns no
rows too, when I think it should return an a null column. I'm posting an
example below:
test=> CREATE TABLE foo (cod SERIAL, bar TEXT);
NOTICE: CREAT
