Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, you can't get better than microsecond precision with timestamps
> in Postgres. And the only way you can rely on that level of precision
> is to compile with --enable-integer-datetimes.
There is more precision in there, but the output routi
If I reduce the precision to 3 for the timestamps it appears to work
although it makes me nervous.
With float timestamps, you're fooling yourself if you think those
numbers past the decimal are reliable.
Should I just recompile to use integer datetimes? I would like to
have at least micros
On Jan 22, 2008, at 3:05 , Stuart Brooks wrote:
If I reduce the precision to 3 for the timestamps it appears to
work although it makes me nervous.
With float timestamps, you're fooling yourself if you think those
numbers past the decimal are reliable.
Should I just recompile to use integ
I have a problem in comparing a TIMESTAMP field with a timestamp
literal. I presume it is to do with the floating point representation of
the timestamp but I was wondering if there is an easy work around
without having to recompile postgres to use integer datetimes.
Basically if I issue a "SEL