On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 01:21:43PM -0400, Stef Telford wrote:
> maybe i am naive in thinking this way, but surely the a database function
> formatting the returned string must be quicker then perl. (speaking
> generically of course, i conceed that there are times when the reverse
> is true)
Form
From: "Stef Telford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> Each select works on a view, rather than hardcode the view into the
> perl CGI, i would rather have the table header/column titles returned
> as the first item as text/html (i know about the func procedure to get the
> table_att
Richard Huxton wrote:
> That's what the list is for, and it's only silly if you already know the
> answer :-)
well, i do agree that the only stupid question is the one not asked
but there are some questions that are universally stupid and jst
hoped this wasnt one of them ;>
> > The long
Stef Telford wrote:
>
> Hello,
> i find i must turn once again to the list for help, in what
> is probably another silly request.
That's what the list is for, and it's only silly if you already know the
answer :-)
> The long and short of it is this, I would like the view to
> re
Hello,
i find i must turn once again to the list for help, in what
is probably another silly request.
I have a view (made of 4 tables) and now find that users
need to have the view different based on some criteria from the
database. its. well. its rather icky to go into. but i can
