Hi,
I would like to know opinions about which approach is better:
Having a table with a field that works as a unique key, or having
several fks that work as a combined key ( all the fks fields )?
Depends on the particular situation, you'll need to give details of the tables
and their place
On Monday 12 January 2004 05:51, katarn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know opinions about which approach is better:
>
> Having a table with a field that works as a unique key, or having
> several fks that work as a combined key ( all the fks fields )?
Depends on the particular situation, you'll
Hi,
I would like to know opinions about which approach is better:
Having a table with a field that works as a unique key, or having
several fks that work as a combined key ( all the fks fields )?
Thanks in advance,
K.
---(end of broadcast)---
TI
