Tom,
Thanks for the reply, and for correcting my broken SQL. :^)
A couple days after I sent my own follow-up message, I realized how
silly my question was. I'll let future questions sit a bit longer
next time.
To make up for my silly question, here is a function + aggregate I
created while w
"David D. Kilzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ wants to write an aggregate function that returns its last input ]
The SQL model of query processing has a very definite view of the stages
of processing: first group by, then aggregate, and last order by. Tuple
ordering is irrelevant according t
NOTE: I did a moderate search through the PgSQL mail list archives,
but couldn't find an example of a question where both ORDER BY and
aggregation were used. In all examples it was possible to use either
one or the other with a possible subselect. [Keep reading...I
discovered how to do this wit
