On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Jean-Paul Argudo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > Where did you get that idea? age's reference point is current_date (ie,
> > midnight) not now(). There are also some differences in the calculation
> > compared to a plain timestamp subtraction.
>
> I'm jumping on this thread to point o
Hi all,
> Where did you get that idea? age's reference point is current_date (ie,
> midnight) not now(). There are also some differences in the calculation
> compared to a plain timestamp subtraction.
I'm jumping on this thread to point out a little strange thing to me.
CURRENT_DATE, converted
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:37:24 -0400, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Marques writes:
>> I just found this problem with the age() function, which AFAIK should
>> give the same resulte as a subtraction of the argument from now(),
>
> Where did you get that idea? age's reference point
Martin Marques writes:
> I just found this problem with the age() function, which AFAIK should
> give the same resulte as a subtraction of the argument from now(),
Where did you get that idea? age's reference point is current_date (ie,
midnight) not now(). There are also some differences in the
I just found this problem with the age() function, which AFAIK should give the
same resulte as a subtraction of the argument from now(), but it doesn't.
prueba=> SELECT (now() - tc.last_cron),age(tc.last_cron),tc.intervalo FROM
tareas_cron tc ;
?column? |
