* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-10-01 18:02]:
> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think you could use EXISTS for that,
> > select EXISTS (); should give a true/false on whether the
> > query returned any rows. I'm not sure if it stops after one row
> > or not, but if it doesn't
Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you could use EXISTS for that,
> select EXISTS (); should give a true/false on whether the
> query returned any rows. I'm not sure if it stops after one row
> or not, but if it doesn't you can add a limit 1 to the query.
Yes it does stop after
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Kevin Way wrote:
> I'm currently using a SELECT count(*) when all I really want to know is
> if 1 or more records exist. Is there a standard way to just find out if
> a record exists? If not, is there a way to avoid iterating over all the
> records by writing an aggregate fu
I'm currently using a SELECT count(*) when all I really want to know is
if 1 or more records exist. Is there a standard way to just find out if
a record exists? If not, is there a way to avoid iterating over all the
records by writing an aggregate function? Given what I've read of how
they work