Re: [SQL] celko nested set functions -- tree move

2002-11-26 Thread Martin Crundall
Hi Robert; The math actually works either way; if it goes negative, the offset is positive, which is okay. Your selects are way more elegant. I guess I was just raising the point that using a key other than lft (which tends to move around in an active tree), is probably safer. The table lock

Re: [SQL] celko nested set functions -- tree move

2002-11-26 Thread Robert Treat
I think you should take a closer look at Greg's function. It is uses lfts as parameters in the function mainly just to make the function implementation independent; I was able to easily adapt it to my schema which uses unique id's for each object in the tree hierarchy. After looking your function

[SQL] celko nested set functions -- tree move

2002-11-25 Thread Martin Crundall
I'm not sure that keying off lft is safe in a multi-user environment. I opted to create and use an objid on the tree definition table, since its identity is static. I also found that when trees get active, allowing for tree IDs increased operation speed quite a bit (i actually push this to two le