On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:32:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> could [a fork] potentially happen?
>
> > Sure, we're BSD, so they're under no obligation to share any code changes
> > with us.
>
> I really doubt that RedHat is silly enough to want
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> could [a fork] potentially happen?
> Sure, we're BSD, so they're under no obligation to share any code changes
> with us.
I really doubt that RedHat is silly enough to want to fork the code.
They haven't forked Linux, gcc, gdb, etc, but have bee
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:28:34PM -0700, clayton cottingham wrote:
> hello:
>
> i thought id find out what people think about this:
> http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2778706,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_rt_latest
>
> which basically points out that redhat will be making their own database
>
hello:
i thought id find out what people think about this:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2778706,00.html?chkpt=zdnn_rt_latest
which basically points out that redhat will be making their own database
based off of postgres7.1
my main concern is that this could cause some sort of s
