At 02:02 AM 28/08/2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
some-dbname/some-schema/TABLES/sometable.sql
some-dbname/some-schema/VIEWS/someview.sql
some-dbname/some-schema/FUNCTIONS/somefunction-param{codes}.sql
some-dbname/some-schema/TYPES/sometype.sql
some-dbname/some-schema/OPERATORS/OPsomeoperator.sql
In this
Philip,
> My thinking at this stage is to try to get pg_dump/restore to produce the
> output directly. Something like:
Hey, you do what you want, of course. However, it seems to me that hacking
AutoDoc would be a *lot* less effort than hacking pg_dump.
Interestingly, though, I was talking t
That depends on the use you plan to... as a backup, useless, as a
documentary tool, very (at least, for what I need).
Our way of developing things is to set up a development box, and set up
the tables, functions, etc etc etc using a set of tools... the only
problem is that these do not provide an
At 02:38 PM 27/08/2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
If it's Perl, I'd be interested in contributing. I've long needed something
like this myself.
My thinking at this stage is to try to get pg_dump/restore to produce the
output directly. Something like:
some-dbname/create.sql
some-dbname/drop.sql
Riccardo,
> Looks promising, but still what I need is a proper CVS output, as I
> need to review the changes made to the specific database structure.
If it's Perl, I'd be interested in contributing. I've long needed something
like this myself.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Fran
"Riccardo G. Facchini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After searching throught the list, I assume you mean this link:
> http://www.rbt.ca/autodoc/index.html
> by Rod Taylor.
>
> Looks promising, but still what I need is a proper CVS output, as I
> need to review the changes made to the specific da
--- Kenneth Gonsalves <__> wrote:
> On Thursday 26 August 2004 04:48 pm, Philip Warner wrote:
> > At 08:43 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
> > >If you know of something even similar to what I'm looking for, let
> me
> > >know.
> >
> > My thinking is to modify pg_dump to add a new outpu
--- Philip Warner <__> wrote:
> At 08:43 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
> >If you know of something even similar to what I'm looking for, let
> me
> >know.
>
> My thinking is to modify pg_dump to add a new output format, but I'd
> like
> to get some more feedback from others first,
On Thursday 26 August 2004 04:48 pm, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 08:43 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
> >If you know of something even similar to what I'm looking for, let me
> >know.
>
> My thinking is to modify pg_dump to add a new output format, but I'd like
> to get some more feedback
At 08:43 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
If you know of something even similar to what I'm looking for, let me
know.
My thinking is to modify pg_dump to add a new output format, but I'd like
to get some more feedback from others first, including yourself. Does what
I specified before s
--- Philip Warner <__> wrote:
> At 08:04 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
> >Does somebody know of a script that does this job?
>
> No, but a very useful idea.
>
> Sounds like another dump format to me -- so long as a well-defined
> structure that is likely to remain invariant over v
At 08:04 PM 26/08/2004, Riccardo G. Facchini wrote:
Does somebody know of a script that does this job?
No, but a very useful idea.
Sounds like another dump format to me -- so long as a well-defined
structure that is likely to remain invariant over versions can be used. A
client uses a trivial scr
Hi All,
Does somebody know of a script that is capable of creating a CVS tree
based on the structure of a given schema or database?
I have a development DB that is structured with a lot of tables,
functions, views, indexes... I've been asked to publish all the changes
under a CVS tree, separating
13 matches
Mail list logo
