Hi, Steve,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SELECT * from some_table WHERE
> test_for_equality_is_syntactically_ugly;
> The WHERE clause expects the function to return a boolean value. I
> can certainly return a boolean value from a function, but here it
> seems to me that what the function really ha
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A SQL-language function like this should get inlined into the query,
> so that you don't lose any performance compared to writing out the
> full expression each time.
I think what's going on here is that he doesn't really want a function in the
programming s
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:38:46AM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > > But imagine instead that this function is more generic. You know
> > > that you're trying to get something that's equal to x and equal to
> > > y, but you don't know (until the func
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:38:46AM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > But imagine instead that this function is more generic. You know
> > that you're trying to get something that's equal to x and equal to
> > y, but you don't know (until the function is called) what those
> > rvalues should be. In
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:16:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > That would work fine if you said RETURNS SETOF ltree.
> >
> > That should work too, except that you are trying to return a record
> > not an ltree value. Try "
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:16:40PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> That would work fine if you said RETURNS SETOF ltree.
>
> That should work too, except that you are trying to return a record
> not an ltree value. Try "RETURN NEXT tree.ltree".
>
> > Because SETOF won't work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You can't do this:
> CREATE FUNCTION xpath(lquery) RETURNS ltree AS $$
> SELECT ltree FROM event WHERE ltree ~ $1;
> $$ LANGUAGE SQL;
That would work fine if you said RETURNS SETOF ltree.
> But I also can't get this kind of thing to work:
> CREATE FUNCTION xpath(lq
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I've got one of these:
> SELECT * from some_table WHERE
> test_for_equality_is_syntactically_ugly;
> What I'd like to do is encapsulate the WHERE clause in a function,
You mean like replacing
SELECT * from some_table WHERE x = 42 AND y = 77
with
create function mytes
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:26:35AM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:16:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've got one of these:
> >
> > SELECT * from some_table WHERE
> > test_for_equality_is_syntactically_ugly;
> >
> > What I'd like to do is encapsulate the WHERE cl
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:16:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've got one of these:
>
> SELECT * from some_table WHERE
> test_for_equality_is_syntactically_ugly;
>
> What I'd like to do is encapsulate the WHERE clause in a function,
> but I'm having no end of trouble.
Would a view work?
Hi All,
I've got one of these:
SELECT * from some_table WHERE
test_for_equality_is_syntactically_ugly;
What I'd like to do is encapsulate the WHERE clause in a function,
but I'm having no end of trouble.
The WHERE clause expects the function to return a boolean value. I
can certainly return a
11 matches
Mail list logo
