On 2-dec-04, at 3:45, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:57:54AM +0100, Johan Henselmans wrote:
Richard Huxton wrote:
I think what's missing here is the explicit statement of which group
these belong in. Without a value to sort/group by, there's nothing
for
your queries to "get a grip
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 06:57:54AM +0100, Johan Henselmans wrote:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
>
> > I think what's missing here is the explicit statement of which group
> > these belong in. Without a value to sort/group by, there's nothing for
> > your queries to "get a grip on".
> >
> > So - add a "
Richard Huxton wrote:
Johan Henselmans wrote:
Hi, I am having a problem grouping a many to many relationship with
payments and receipts, where a payment can be for multiple receipts,
and a receipt can have multiple payments. I got a list of records that
are involved in such relations, but now I
Johan Henselmans wrote:
Hi, I am having a problem grouping a many to many relationship with
payments and receipts, where a payment can be for multiple receipts, and
a receipt can have multiple payments. I got a list of records that are
involved in such relations, but now I don't know how to grou
Hi, I am having a problem grouping a many to many relationship with
payments and receipts, where a payment can be for multiple receipts,
and a receipt can have multiple payments. I got a list of records that
are involved in such relations, but now I don't know how to group them
so that all paym
