Re: [SQL] performance of functions - or rather lack of it

2001-04-05 Thread Peter Galbavy
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:01:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Without knowing which PG version you're using, what plans you're > getting, or even whether you've VACUUM ANALYZEd lately, it's difficult > to say more than that. I followed that up quickly - server 7.0.2, client 7.1RC1. VACUUMed etc pri

Re: [SQL] performance of functions - or rather lack of it

2001-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Galbavy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We are building a postgresql based backend database for our 'hosting > provisioning' system. In a vain attempt to add some, what I thought, simple > performance tweaks, I thought I would try putting some of the larger and > more straighforward queries

Re: [SQL] performance of functions - or rather lack of it

2001-04-04 Thread Peter Galbavy
BTW The service is 7.0.2 and the client 7.1RC1 and the OSes are OpenBSD/i386 2.8-stable. On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Peter Galbavy wrote: > We are building a postgresql based backend database for our 'hosting > provisioning' system. In a vain attempt to add some, what I thought, sim

[SQL] performance of functions - or rather lack of it

2001-04-04 Thread Peter Galbavy
We are building a postgresql based backend database for our 'hosting provisioning' system. In a vain attempt to add some, what I thought, simple performance tweaks, I thought I would try putting some of the larger and more straighforward queries into functions. For everything else the same, the fu