Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-23 Thread Joe Conway
Greg Stark wrote: Just as a side comment, one trick I found very helpful in my mail filters is to treat any message with one of my message-ids in the references as a personal message as far as mail notifications. This way I get notifications for any message on a thread following a post of my own. I

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-22 Thread Greg Stark
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't* include > the direct reply to me, because I very actively filter/redirect my mail. > Replies directly to me are pretty much guaranteed to be seen quickly, but the > ones that go to the li

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 13:45:21 -0700, Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > >The duplication is needless. Direct replies very often get to the recipient > ^ > is *not* needless? Yeah, I made a typo. -

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-11 Thread Rod Taylor
> > faster than ones sent through the lists. It is also possible that the direct > > replies might be handled differently by the recipient (e.g. a filter may put > > them in different folders). > > This is very true. In fact, I get mildly annoyed when people *don't* > include the direct reply to

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-11 Thread Joe Conway
Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:33:08 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to the OP and not to the list. reply-all

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:33:08 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the > list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to > the OP and not to the list. reply-all button res

Re: [SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-07 Thread Tom Lane
Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the > list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to > the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication It works fine for

[SQL] reply to setting

2004-08-06 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
hi, any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication -- regards kg http://www.onlineindianhotels.net - fastest hotel