mikeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after about 50,000 updates, which fly right along, the process begins
> to really bog down. we perform a vacuum analzye and it speeds right
> up again.
A plain "vacuum" should do the job in a bit less time. The problem
is you need to reclaim the space occupie
hi,
we have a weird situation here. we have a table of approx. 10k rows
representing accumulated activity by specific customers. as information
is gathered those customers rows are updated. the number of rows does not
increase unless we get a new customer so that is not a factor. the table
