David Johnston, 20.09.2011 16:15:
I'm just wondering if this is intended behavioury, simply not (yet)
implemented or even invalid according to the standard? I didn't
find any reference that it's not allowed in the manual.
Regards Thomas
Try sticking the recursive keyword after the "with" if a
On Sep 20, 2011, at 5:58, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering if this is intended behavioury, simply not (yet)
> implemented or even invalid according to the standard? I didn't find any
> reference that it's not allowed in the manual.
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
>
Try sticking the rec