"Josh Berkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What you seem to be telling us is that, other than
> inheritance, PGSQL doesn't really support OODB functionality
> at this time. Is that an accurate summary assessment?
What's your definition of "OODB functionality"? That's the kind
of term that can
Tom,
> I'd recommend the traditional SQL solution: add a primary
> key to the
> address table and reference key values in the client
> table.
What you seem to be telling us is that, other than
inheritance, PGSQL doesn't really support OODB functionality
at this time. Is that an accurate summary
