On 2012-01-16, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> [ "0x13" is lexed as "0" then "x13" ]
>
>>> Is this behaviour really conforming to the standard?
>
>> Well, it's pretty much the universal behavior of flex-based lexers,
>> anyway. A token ends when the next character can no longer se
Tom Lane wrote:
>> [ "0x13" is lexed as "0" then "x13" ]
>> Is this behaviour really conforming to the standard?
> Well, it's pretty much the universal behavior of flex-based lexers,
> anyway. A token ends when the next character can no longer sensibly
> be added to it.
I know, but - off the
Tim Landscheidt writes:
> [ "0x13" is lexed as "0" then "x13" ]
> Is this behaviour really conforming to the standard?
Well, it's pretty much the universal behavior of flex-based lexers,
anyway. A token ends when the next character can no longer sensibly
be added to it.
Possibly the documentat