Re: [SQL] bit field changes in 7.2.1

2002-07-08 Thread Kevin Brannen
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Kevin Brannen writes: > > >>EXCEPT that now fails in 7.2.1 (I just upgraded this afternoon). It >>forces me to use "b'00'" instead of "b'0'::bit(6)". > > > Which is a problem why? Because in the real system, it will be b'0'::bit(64) or b'001::bit(64) or etc. A

Re: [SQL] bit field changes in 7.2.1

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Kevin Brannen writes: > EXCEPT that now fails in 7.2.1 (I just upgraded this afternoon). It > forces me to use "b'00'" instead of "b'0'::bit(6)". Which is a problem why? > Searching thru the docs, I find a note that says: > > --- > Note: Prior to PostgreSQL 7.2, BIT type data was zero-pad