know about your thoughts on this?
Thanks in advance
Best,
Oliver
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Marlowe"
To: "Mark Fenbers"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [SQL] complex query
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Mark Fenbers
wrote:
I
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> I'd do somethings like:
>
> select * from (
> select id, sum(col1), sum(col2) from tablename group by yada
>) as a [full, left, right, outer] join (
> select id, sum(col3), sum(col4) from tablename group by bada
> ) as b
> on (
I'd do somethings like:
select * from (
select id, sum(col1), sum(col2) from tablename group by yada
) as a [full, left, right, outer] join (
select id, sum(col3), sum(col4) from tablename group by bada
) as b
on (a.id=b.id);
and choose the join type as appropria
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> I have a query:
> SELECT id, SUM(col1), SUM(col2) FROM mytable WHERE condition1 = true GROUP
> BY id;
>
> This gives me 3 columns, but what I want is 5 columns where the next two
> columns -- SUM(col3), SUM(col4) -- have a slightly different W
x27;
") 23:59:59' as datetime)
Did the above, got the expected results, did not
specify 'Outer Join' only specified Join, is that a problem?
From: Muralidharan Ramakrishnan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005
10:41 PMTo: Wadhwa, Amit; pgsql-sql@postgr
SELECT A.SID , A.RECDATE , B.MID , B.MBDATE , C.ISSDATE FROM TableA A LEFT OUTER JOIN TableB B ON A.SID = B.SIDLEFT OUTER JOIN TableC C ON B.MID = C.MIDORDER BY A.SID[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Using Postgres 8.0 on Windows Server 2003 - 16GB Ram, 3Ghz X 2 Xeons
Accessing through JDBC / J
Thanks a lot, that worked for me!
-Original Message-
From: Richard Huxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:47 PM
To: Wadhwa, Amit
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Complex Query - Data from 3 tables simultaneously
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically I want a raw dump of data
- Should have all the shipments regardless of whether they have any
material items entered or not
- Should have all Material Items for Every Shipment regardless of
whether it was issued or not.
I know I need an outer join (Do I Not?