Re: [SQL] Error message during compressed backup

2003-11-04 Thread Senthil Kumar S
ED]> To: "Senthil Kumar S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "psql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:01 PM Subject: Re: [SQL] Error message during compressed backup > Senthil Kumar S writes: > > > $ $ pg_dump -h 192.xxx.x

Re: [SQL] Error message during compressed backup

2003-10-28 Thread Kumar
ED]> To: "Senthil Kumar S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "psql" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:01 PM Subject: Re: [SQL] Error message during compressed backup > Senthil Kumar S writes: > > > $ $ pg_dump -h 192.xxx.x.xxx -p 5432 -v testdb

Re: [SQL] Error message during compressed backup

2003-10-24 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Senthil Kumar S writes: > $ $ pg_dump -h 192.xxx.x.xxx -p 5432 -v testdb -f > /home/db_repository/testdb20031023.sql.tar.gz -u -F c > WARNING: owner of function "plpgsql_call_handler" appears to be invalid Run select proowner from pg_proc where proname = 'plpgsql_call_handler'; which gives yo

Re: [SQL] Error message with a SQL function

2003-08-14 Thread krystoffff
Thanks You were right, it was because of the return void But I think in the documentation, I read somewhere that this kind of return was allowed ... I must have mistaken ... ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

Re: [SQL] Error message with a SQL function

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (krysto) writes: > CREATE FUNCTION update_affiliate(int,double precision,double > precision) RETURNS void AS ' UPDATE affiliate SET balance=balance + > $2, balance_in_points=balance_in_points + ( $2 / $3 ) WHERE id = $1; ' > LANGUAGE 'sql'; I don't believe there was a type "v

Re: [SQL] Error message: standard SQL or PostgreQSL?

2002-11-15 Thread Stephan Szabo
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Huub wrote: > Hi, > > When I copied a function call into an SQL-statement and executed it, I > got the message 'Aggregate function calls may not be nested'. Does that > mean this is the case in standard SQL or is this specifically PostgreSQL? Umm, both sort of. It's an entr

Re: [SQL] Error message: standard SQL or PostgreQSL?

2002-11-15 Thread Tom Lane
Huub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I copied a function call into an SQL-statement and executed it, I > got the message 'Aggregate function calls may not be nested'. Does that > mean this is the case in standard SQL or is this specifically PostgreSQL? It's in the standard: SQL92 (which calls

Re: [SQL] error message...

2001-05-15 Thread Justin Clift
Hi Sven, There is a startup option, "-N" of how many clients are allowed to be connected simultaneously. The default is 32 in the source code, not sure if SuSE has it changed. You can also alter the default maximum before compiling it, but I get the feeling you've installed pre-built packages.