On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] frederik nietzsche wrote:
> ok, thanks for the (double: two mails ;) ) help, but
> in this way when I insert a record in a child table,
> the key must be already present in the "sigles" table,
> otherwise it breaks the reference and doesn't insert
> anything.
>
ok, thanks for the (double: two mails ;) ) help, but
in this way when I insert a record in a child table,
the key must be already present in the "sigles" table,
otherwise it breaks the reference and doesn't insert
anything.
In order to use this solution I must create a set of
function that when I
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] frederik nietzsche wrote:
> as if the sigles where not in the "sigles" table, but
> it's there!
> it's probably because of the way in which psql threats
> the inheritance.
> my question is (finally): is there some workaround for
> this?? or: am I making some mi
