Hello,
I am trying to convert an application to postgresql, and am having a
bear of a time converting the following view (from oracle). What it
does, just in case you aren't very familiar with oracle syntax, is group
the average reg_state from the events_registrations table after having
converted
Hi!
Is there a way to put in order the rows in a table?
the problem is that i want to keep a "tree" in the db, but the leaves must be
ordered...
does someone have an idea?
thanks,
Camila
Hello all;
I'm trying to speed up a query which returns the majority of a table so and
index isn't helpful.
I've got more than enough RAM to hold my table so, can anyone tell me if
there is there a way to force Postgres to cache a table in RAM?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks;
-Kevin Trau
Hello,
I posted some observations to the performance of postgres some weeks
ago.
The problem with the poor performance of "select distinct" still exists,
but I tried to worked out some reproducable results in a less complicated
way than in my first postings.
'select distinct' preforms on Orac
Hello, I need help on this rule:
CREATE RULE rule AS ON INSERT TO table WHERE (sum(new."field") > 10) DO
INSTEAD NOTHING;
Creation is ok but in inserting a row I get the following from pgaccessII
number -2147467259
ERROR: fireRIRrules: failed to remove aggs from qual...
Removing the INSTEAD from
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 11:51:32PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well, I'd rather it didn't change at all. IMHO it's a feature, not a bug. In
> > any case, if it does get changed we'll have to go through the documentation
> > and work out whether we mean current_t
On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 11:28:03PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, we have two db's returning statement start time, and Oracle 8 not
> having CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.
>
> Have we agreed to make CURRENT_TIMESTAMP statement start, and now()
> transaction start? Is this an open item or TODO item?
W
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Kevin Traub wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> I'm trying to speed up a query which returns the majority of a table so and
> index isn't helpful.
> I've got more than enough RAM to hold my table so, can anyone tell me if
> there is there a way to force Postgres to cache a table in RAM?
>
How do you plan to keep your tree represented??
There are quite a few options for this.
Extensive talk has been made in this list.
Also search the archives.
Basically you can follow
- nested trees (pure sql) aproach
- Genealogical tree representation approach
(either using text to represent the
"Matthew Geddert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> create or replace view events_orders_states
> as
> select o.*,
> o_states.order_state
> from events_orders o,
> (select
> order_id,
> decode (floor(avg (decode (reg_state,
>'canceled', 0,
>'waiting', 1,
>
On Thursday 03 Oct 2002 3:03 pm, Kevin Traub wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> I'm trying to speed up a query which returns the majority of a table so and
> index isn't helpful.
> I've got more than enough RAM to hold my table so, can anyone tell me if
> there is there a way to force Postgres to cache a tab
On Monday 30 Sep 2002 7:29 pm, Camila Rocha wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there a way to put in order the rows in a table? the problem is that i
> want to keep a "tree" in the db, but the leaves must be ordered... does
> someone have an idea?
Do a search on "Joe Celko" and "tree" and you should find a clea
"Kevin Traub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to speed up a query which returns the majority of a table so and
> index isn't helpful.
> I've got more than enough RAM to hold my table so, can anyone tell me if
> there is there a way to force Postgres to cache a table in RAM?
There is no n
Edoardo Causarano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, I need help on this rule:
> CREATE RULE rule AS ON INSERT TO table WHERE (sum(new."field") > 10) DO
> INSTEAD NOTHING;
> Creation is ok but in inserting a row I get the following from pgaccessII
> number -2147467259
> ERROR: fireRIRrules: fail
"Michael Contzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ select distinct takes a long time on 7+ million rows ]
What do you have sort_mem set to? The default value is mighty small,
and that would translate directly to poor performance in DISTINCT.
Still though, the speed differential against Oracle is
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 14:18:50 +0200,
Michael Contzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here the table:
>
> mc=# \d egal
> Table "public.egal"
> Column | Type | Modifiers
> +-+---
> i | integer |
>
> mc=# select count(*) from egal;
> count
> -
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Achilleus Mantzios wrote:
>
> How do you plan to keep your tree represented??
>
> There are quite a few options for this.
> Extensive talk has been made in this list.
> Also search the archives.
> Basically you can follow
> - nested trees (pure sql) aproach
> - Genealogical tr
Kevin,
> I'm trying to speed up a query which returns the majority of a table
> so and
> index isn't helpful.
> I've got more than enough RAM to hold my table so, can anyone tell me
> if
> there is there a way to force Postgres to cache a table in RAM?
Please join the PGSQL-PERFORMANCE mailing l
Camila Rocha wrote:
> Is there a way to put in order the rows in a table? the problem is that i w=
> ant to keep a "tree" in the db, but the leaves must be ordered...
> does someone have an idea?
If you don't mind trying 7.3 beta, there is a function called connectby() in
contrib/tablefunc. It w
I'm having difficulty coming up with the right join to get my results.
I'm using PostgreSQL 7.2.x
I'm looking for a "most likely match" result. Assume you have a table with two fields,
field 1 is a serial key (unique) and field 2 is varchar.
Assume that you have the following entries in the
Hi ,
can anyone tell me how can i enforce below in a table.
I want that no more that one distinct userid exists for a given group_id
in the table.
ie i want 1 to 1 mapping between group_id and userid so that , there shud not be a
single group_id having more that one kind of userid.
SELECT gr
Sorry Bhuvan it wont work,
COMPOSITE UNIQUE INDEX will prevent entry of rows like (group_id,user_id)
1 1
1 1
what i want to prevent is this:
1 1
1 2
did you notice the distinct inside the count?
regds
mallah.
On Saturday 05 October 2002 12:36, Bhuvan A wrote:
> > SELECT group_id from
22 matches
Mail list logo