Hi,
I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a text field
('identifier') which i need to query for matching rows. The question is if i
have multiple strings to match against this field I can use multiple OR
sub-statements or multiple statements in a UNION. The UNION see
hi Adam,
im not sure which is faster/slower but, possibly you can speed it up by
using "in" operator
...where lower(identifier) *in *(lower('BUGS001884677')*
,*lower('BUGS001884678')
*,*);
if you create function based index:
CREATE INDEX idx_table_lower_text ON table(*lower*(text_fie
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:12:52 am Janiv Ratson wrote:
> Hi Adrain and thank you,
> Trac 0.12 uses microseconds as time value.
> What do you suggest?
extract(epoch ..) returns seconds which you are trying to compare to
microseconds. The solution would be to divide your 'time' values by 1,000,
-Original Message-
From: pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-sql-ow...@postgresql.org]
On Behalf Of adam_pgsql
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 7:39 AM
To: pgsql-sql
Subject: [SQL] which is better: using OR clauses or UNION?
Hi,
I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. T
adam_pgsql writes:
> I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a
> text field ('identifier') which i need to query for matching rows. The
> question is if i have multiple strings to match against this field I
> can use multiple OR sub-statements or multiple statements in a
>
On 2011-08-16, adam_pgsql wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a
>text field ('identifier') which i need to query for matching rows. The
>question is if i have multiple strings to match against this field I
>can use multiple OR sub-statements or multi
Hi Viktor,
thanks for your email, gave that a try, but the
lower(identifier) LIKE lower('BUGS001884677') OR
still comes in quicker than the IN approach
thanks
adam
On 16 Aug 2011, at 12:56, Viktor Bojović wrote:
> hi Adam,
> im not sure which is faster/slower but, possibly you can sp
Hi Adrain and thank you,
Trac 0.12 uses microseconds as time value.
What do you suggest?
Thanks,
Janiv.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Klaver [mailto:adrian.kla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 17:14
To: Janiv Ratson
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] bigint and
Hi and thanks again.
I use the following query but it returns me 0 rows (it should return more):
SELECT ticket, "time", author, field, oldvalue, newvalue
FROM ticket_change
where "time"
BETWEEN
extract(epoch from (date 'now' - integer '30')) AND
extract(epoch from (date 'no
Additional information:
If I use the following query:
select "time", extract(epoch from (date 'now' - integer '30')), extract(epoch
from (date 'now'))
from ticket_change
The first row looks like this:
Bigint, double precision, double precision
128609061500;131085;1313442000
Thanks,
Jan
Hi,
I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a text field
('identifier') which i need to query for matching rows. The question is if i
have multiple strings to match against this field I can use multiple OR
sub-statements or multiple statements in a UNION. The UNION see
On 16 Aug 2011, at 15:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> adam_pgsql writes:
>> I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a
>> text field ('identifier') which i need to query for matching rows. The
>> question is if i have multiple strings to match against this field I
>> can use multip
> -Original Message-
> From: adam_pgsql [mailto:adam_pg...@witneyweb.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 7:39 AM
> To: pgsql-sql
> Subject: which is better: using OR clauses or UNION?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a query hitting a table of 25 million rows. The table has a
text
> field ('identi
Hi everyone,
I'm a bit lazy, or actually in a bit of a crunch. I added an audit
recording a few months ago, but never really used it much, but today I'm
seeing a bunch of suspicious activity by one user. Does someone have
any function to quickly parse this data?
I followed this: http://wik
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:02 PM, M. D. wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm a bit lazy, or actually in a bit of a crunch. I added an audit
> recording a few months ago, but never really used it much, but today I'm
> seeing a bunch of suspicious activity by one user. Does someone have any
> function to
15 matches
Mail list logo