Hi Sean,
> Le 26 juil. 2019 à 15:23, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
>
> demarey wrote
>> we want more feedback before promoting it.
>
> "Show in folder" doesn't work - still trying to use OSProcess which appears
> to no longer be loaded. BTW IMHO it would be better to create a layer to
> hide the p
Hi Stef,
On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 09:19, ducasse wrote:
>
> It would be good to encapsulate this behavior may be with double dispatch
> with the platform.
> Else clients end up to be forced to check.
Why do you think this might need double dispatch?
My idea was that it can be added to FileSystemD
> On 6 Aug 2019, at 12:01, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
> Hi Stef,
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 09:19, ducasse wrote:
>>
>> It would be good to encapsulate this behavior may be with double dispatch
>> with the platform.
>> Else clients end up to be forced to check.
>
> Why do you think this might
For future reference: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4201
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 12:01, Alistair Grant wrote:
>
> Hi Stef,
>
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 09:19, ducasse wrote:
> >
> > It would be good to encapsulate this behavior may be with double dispatch
> > with the platform.
> > E
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 12:05, ducasse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 6 Aug 2019, at 12:01, Alistair Grant wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stef,
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 09:19, ducasse wrote:
> >>
> >> It would be good to encapsulate this behavior may be with double dispatch
> >> with the platform.
> >> Else clients
Ok then this is good.
>
> Something like this will work:
>
> aDirectoryFileReference entries select: [ :each | each isHidden ]
>
> Cheers,
> Alistair
>
I should have looked before typing :-) My memory of the
FileSystemDirectoryEntry hierarchy was wrong, so it isn't as simple as
I thought. But I'll still take a look at this.
Cheers,
Alistair
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 12:19, ducasse wrote:
>
> Ok then this is good.
>
> >
> > Something like this wil
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #597 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #4200 was integrated: "Fixing the dependency analysis of
BaselineOfIDE"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4200
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #598 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #4202 was integrated: "Move method to make it work"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4202
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/fix/udptest
Build Ur
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #599 was: SUCCESS.
The Pull Request #4207 was integrated:
"4206-Cleaning-arcTan-comment-and-adding-executable-comments"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4207
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #600 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #4193 was integrated: "Remove-shadow-variables"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4193
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/Remove
Build Url:
https
There is a new Pharo build available!
The status of the build #601 was: FAILURE.
The Pull Request #4215 was integrated:
"4214-Code-Completion-DNU-on-visitAssignmentNode"
Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/4215
Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues
12 matches
Mail list logo
