2016-09-06 19:06 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Denis Kudriashov wrote
> >> Is that to say that the network holds them strongly?
>
> I'm curious, why?
>
Imaging we send object A from server to client as reference. On client
object A will be represented by proxy and any message to it will produce
Denis Kudriashov wrote
>> Is that to say that the network holds them strongly?
I'm curious, why?
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Ann-New-Seamless-version-0-9-0-tp4914168p4914408.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabb
2016-09-06 18:01 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Denis Kudriashov wrote
> > But it could be problem if you will manage your domain objects be
> > transferred as value.
>
> I don't understand. Does this relate to classes not being loaded in the
> system?
>
Imaging that you have Point with format (x
2016-09-06 18:01 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Is that to say that the network holds them strongly?
yes
Denis Kudriashov wrote
> But it could be problem if you will manage your domain objects be
> transferred as value.
I don't understand. Does this relate to classes not being loaded in the
system?
Denis Kudriashov wrote
> During network lifetime unused proxies and references are not collected.
> I
2016-09-06 16:37 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Denis Kudriashov wrote
> > Yes, it is new implementation of remote smalltalk. Look at my blog for
> > details and docs
> > http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/07/major-seamless-update.html
>
> Wow! This is really awesome. I love that you don't have to
Denis Kudriashov wrote
> Yes, it is new implementation of remote smalltalk. Look at my blog for
> details and docs
> http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/2016/07/major-seamless-update.html
Wow! This is really awesome. I love that you don't have to have the classes
loaded in the image to deal with the pro
2016-09-05 15:40 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov :
> And here is working script to load it:
>
> Metacello new
> smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: ’Seamless';
> configuration: ’Seamless';
> version: #stable;
> load
>
> Loading by Gofer or directly by configuration is not working now
Hi Sean.
2016-09-05 16:39 GMT+02:00 Sean P. DeNigris :
> Awesome! Is this "the" Pharo library for sharing live objects between
> images? IIUC it's a successor to rST, correct?
>
Yes, it is new implementation of remote smalltalk. Look at my blog for
details and docs
http://dionisiydk.blogspot.fr/
Denis Kudriashov wrote
> I released new version of Seamless 0.9.0.
Awesome! Is this "the" Pharo library for sharing live objects between
images? IIUC it's a successor to rST, correct? Are there other remote
communication libraries, and if so how does Seamless compare?
Thanks for all the great wor
2016-09-05 15:52 GMT+02:00 philippe.b...@highoctane.be <
philippe.b...@gmail.com>:
> What is TostSerializer ?
It is new binary serialization library which supposed to be used for
objects transport.
It not provides any meta data or support for object migration like Fuel. So
it should not be used
What is TostSerializer ?
Le 5 sept. 2016 15:19, "Denis Kudriashov" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I released new version of Seamless 0.9.0.
> It is based on specialized TostSerializer instead of Fuel.
>
> This version is ~4 times faster than previous one and produce much compact
> data packets.
> For examp
And here is working script to load it:
Metacello new
smalltalkhubUser: 'Pharo' project: ’Seamless';
configuration: ’Seamless';
version: #stable;
load
Loading by Gofer or directly by configuration is not working now (it is
really strange)
2016-09-05 15:18 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudri
Hi,
I released new version of Seamless 0.9.0.
It is based on specialized TostSerializer instead of Fuel.
This version is ~4 times faster than previous one and produce much compact
data packets.
For example Fuel based version takes 400 bytes to return small integer as
result of message send. Now i
14 matches
Mail list logo
