Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-users] RTAnchorConstraint

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:08, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> >> There is no other solution? Alex, do you have any idea? > > To which problem? Copy-paste from original mail: anchor constraints: they do not play well with layouts and animations. Try the code below (adapted from the example to us

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-users] RTAnchorConstraint

Any code I can have to reproduce the problem? Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > On Mar 10, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Johan Fabry wrote: > > But now there is a new bug RTAnchorCons

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-users] RTAnchorConstraint

> > There is no other solution? Alex, do you have any idea? To which problem? Alexandre

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-users] RTAnchorConstraint

> On Mar 9, 2016, at 18:51, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Johan Fabry > wrote: > Heh, also a funny feature of your anchor constraints: they do not play well > with layouts and animations. Try the code below (adapted from the example