Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] [squeak-dev] The Trunk: Network-topa.166.mcz

2015-10-24 Thread Levente Uzonyi
I don't see how using KISS would have any effect on this problem - the problem of setting the initial state of the generator. I also don't see how could KISS be implemented in Smalltalk efficiently. Levente On Thu, 22 Oct 2015, Nicolas Cellier wrote: For these reasons, I often prefer the Mars

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] [squeak-dev] The Trunk: Network-topa.166.mcz

2015-10-23 Thread Serge Stinckwich
Yes I could have a look but no time right now ... On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:07 PM, stepharo wrote: > In SciSmalltalk we added some more random generators but people should have > a look > > > Stef > > > Le 22/10/15 18:21, Nicolas Cellier a écrit : > > For these reasons, I often prefer the M

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] [squeak-dev] The Trunk: Network-topa.166.mcz

2015-10-22 Thread stepharo
In SciSmalltalk we added some more random generators but people should have a look Stef Le 22/10/15 18:21, Nicolas Cellier a écrit : For these reasons, I often prefer the Marsaglia's KISS 2015-10-22 17:57 GMT+02:00 Henrik Johansen mailto:henrik.s.johan...@veloxit.no>>: > On 22 O

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Vm-dev] [squeak-dev] The Trunk: Network-topa.166.mcz

2015-10-22 Thread Nicolas Cellier
For these reasons, I often prefer the Marsaglia's KISS 2015-10-22 17:57 GMT+02:00 Henrik Johansen : > > > On 22 Oct 2015, at 2:49 , Tobias Pape wrote: > > > > > > > > On 22.10.2015, at 14:37, David T. Lewis wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:28:09AM +, comm...@source.squeak.org > wr