Hmm, for micro-benchmark maybe, but this has to be measured once the JIT is
ready.
>From the stack VM, I can notice a slight slowdown w.r.t. 32 bits stack.
But it doesn't really matter, stak is too slow compared to COG, so let's
wait.
2015-12-21 21:24 GMT+01:00 stepharo :
> :)
:)
So is it correct to think that a lot of number oriented computation will
go faster because not on large positive integers?
Stef
Le 20/12/15 13:39, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
SmallInteger maxVal highBit -> 60.
3 bits reserved for immediate tags, 1 bit for sign, 60 remaining for
positive
Super !!!
Eliot what will be
1 class maxval
then?
Stef
Le 17/12/15 20:12, Eliot Miranda a écrit :
Hi All,
the real Cog 64-bit Spur x64 VM just evaluated 3+4 correctly on Mac
OS X:
SmallInteger maxVal highBit -> 60.
3 bits reserved for immediate tags, 1 bit for sign, 60 remaining for
positive magnitude...
2015-12-20 11:56 GMT+01:00 stepharo :
> Super !!!
> Eliot what will be
>
> 1 class maxval
> then?
>
> Stef
>
> Le 17/12/15 20:12, Eliot Miranda a écrit
Fantastic!
cheers -ben
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Eliot Miranda
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>the real Cog 64-bit Spur x64 VM just evaluated 3+4 correctly on Mac OS
> X:
>
> Early days yet. This is a debug VM. The optimised VM does not yet
> display the prompt. But
This is great news!
Thierry
Le 17/12/2015 20:12, Eliot Miranda a écrit :
Hi All,
the real Cog 64-bit Spur x64 VM just evaluated 3+4 correctly on Mac
OS X:
Early days yet. This is a debug VM. The optimised VM does not yet
display the prompt. But we can be confident that a 64-bit
Can't wait esp for the 64-bit address space ;-)
> On 18 Dec 2015, at 06:46, Thierry Goubier wrote:
>
> This is great news!
>
> Thierry
>
> Le 17/12/2015 20:12, Eliot Miranda a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>>the real Cog 64-bit Spur x64 VM just evaluated 3+4 correctly