Igor Stasenko wrote
> cool
Yes, very!
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Re-Nautilus-Package-Tree-tp4738896p4752462.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Le 03/04/2014 01:03, Igor Stasenko a écrit :
cool
+1
but that means we need a resident configs in image, which IMO is a plus.
right now we don't.
You can cope with a pre-existing classification for stuff already in the
image, and configs for the additional stuff. Works. A touch is the
abil
cool
+1
but that means we need a resident configs in image, which IMO is a plus.
right now we don't.
On 2 April 2014 15:56, Goubier Thierry wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> I got a simple version of your configuration querying idea working.
>
> Regards,
>
> Thierry
>
>
> Le 24/01/2014 03:11, Sean DeNigri
Hi Sean,
I got a simple version of your configuration querying idea working.
Regards,
Thierry
Le 24/01/2014 03:11, Sean DeNigris a écrit :
> I think the tree nodes should be based on name-matching and not only
per-package
I should've appended: "as a compromise for the time being"...
In 4.0,
Sean,
I find this very interesting.
Le 24/01/2014 03:11, Sean DeNigris a écrit :
> I think the tree nodes should be based on name-matching and not only
per-package
I should've appended: "as a compromise for the time being"...
In 4.0, imagine this killer combination:
- Declare high-level logic
