Re: [Pharo-dev] 16666 CI validation Failure misreported as Success

2015-09-30 3:16 GMT+02:00 Ben Coman : > Of the eight issues currently "Resolved (Fix Reviewed By monkey)" > which passed validation successfully, three seem to actually be failures. > That is, Fogbugz shows SUCCESS when the validation report shows FAILURE. > > * 16577 Random

Re: [Pharo-dev] 16666 CI validation Failure misreported as Success

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Christophe Demarey wrote: > > Le 30 sept. 2015 à 03:16, Ben Coman a écrit : > >> Of the eight issues currently "Resolved (Fix Reviewed By monkey)" >> which passed validation successfully, three seem to actually be failures. >> That is,

Re: [Pharo-dev] 16666 CI validation Failure misreported as Success

- Mail original - > De: "Ben Coman" <b...@openinworld.com> > À: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Envoyé: Mercredi 30 Septembre 2015 14:14:06 > Objet: Re: [Pharo-dev] 1 CI validation Failure misreported as Succe

[Pharo-dev] 16666 CI validation Failure misreported as Success

Of the eight issues currently "Resolved (Fix Reviewed By monkey)" which passed validation successfully, three seem to actually be failures. That is, Fogbugz shows SUCCESS when the validation report shows FAILURE. * 16577 Random should be in its own package * 16634 Rename layout to classLayout