Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
> Are you sure your #printString is OK ?
Aha! @$!$%!#$!#$#@
I got bitten for the umpteenth time by the #name trap. My custom #printOn:
was calling #name, which I hadn't yet defined, and so called the default
implementation, which sends #printString => infinite
Max Leske wrote
> Did you send #basicInspect? That should still give you the original
> minimal inspector.
Good tip! I didn't think of that. I see it's even in the context menu :)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
We should integrate the Mirror package of guillermo. But he was busy and
sick.
Stef
Le 16/12/15 23:03, Esteban A. Maringolo a écrit :
Yeap, they are in the VM, I used them with the fileout you sent me.
I guess Tudor was referring to the spur *image* and not the VM.
The issue is already
Would certainly be interesting. Until mirrors come, I would still use the
primitives as there are only a few places and we can adapt later on again.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 17, 2015, at 8:06 PM, stepharo wrote:
>
> We should integrate the Mirror package of guillermo. But he
I am waiting for the Spur image because it should already have the primitives
and I will get back to the ProtoObject issue. Could you open an issue in the
meantime?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
> wrote:
>
> Doru,
>
> Did you fix
Doru,
Did you fix the issue involving instances of subclasses of ProtoObject?
Esteban A. Maringolo
2015-12-16 2:46 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> Indeed, please help us isolate that case.
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 11:49 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Yes, but they were not in the image and as the Spur image was coming
> anyway I thought I just wait for it :)
>
+1 then :)
>
> Doru
>
>
> > On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Eliot Miranda
>
Yes, but they were not in the image and as the Spur image was coming anyway I
thought I just wait for it :)
Doru
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> I am waiting
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> I am waiting for the Spur image because it should already have the
> primitives and I will get back to the ProtoObject issue. Could you open an
> issue in the meantime?
>
The mirror primitives should be in the old VM
Yeap, they are in the VM, I used them with the fileout you sent me.
I guess Tudor was referring to the spur *image* and not the VM.
The issue is already opened:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17170/Context-missing-primitives
Esteban A. Maringolo
2015-12-16 18:55 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda
I just tried to inspect a domain object and I froze my image and had to force
quit. How do I debug this? And, more importantly, when an error is
encountered in a critical, basic tool like this, should there be some
reasonable bare-bones alternative, like the emergency debugger? Not being
able to
I assume you are using the GT inspector. Do you have custom gt inspector
presentations ? Are you sure your #printString is OK ?
There is also a 'Basic Inspect It' menu item ...
Can you isolate it so that we can see it, try it ?
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 23:21, Sean P. DeNigris
Hi,
Indeed, please help us isolate that case.
Cheers,
Doru
> On Dec 15, 2015, at 11:49 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> I assume you are using the GT inspector. Do you have custom gt inspector
> presentations ? Are you sure your #printString is OK ?
>
> There is also a
> On 15 Dec 2015, at 23:21, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
>
> I just tried to inspect a domain object and I froze my image and had to force
> quit. How do I debug this? And, more importantly, when an error is
> encountered in a critical, basic tool like this, should there be
14 matches
Mail list logo