[Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: === Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83 Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53 Customized GT-Inspect

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the Moose team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? Doru On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: > > === > Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVan

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba wrote: > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the Moose > team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits behind. > Doru > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Done! Doru On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the Moose > team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? > > Done, you'll have to merge my versio

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

I'll make a new version to integrate. Cheers, Andrei On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Done! > > Doru > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe > wrote: > >> >> On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba wrote: >> >> > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks gr

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? Stef I'll make a new version to integrate. Cheers, Andrei On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba > wrote: Done! Doru On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe mailto:s...@st

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). Anyone against "Raw"? Cheers, Doru On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, stepharo wrote: > Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? > > Stef > > > I'll make a new version to integrate. > > > Cheers, > Andrei > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 P

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Tudor Girba wrote: Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). Anyone against "Raw"? Cheers, Doru Raw is good.

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Raw is good, but what about 'Structure' ? AFAIU, it is the State/Structure that is used for the tree view, right ? On 03 Oct 2014, at 22:50, Tudor Girba wrote: > Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). > > Anyone against "Raw"? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, step

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

'Structure' is large :P > On 04 Oct 2014, at 08:58, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > Raw is good, but what about 'Structure' ? > AFAIU, it is the State/Structure that is used for the tree view, right ? > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 22:50, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the pin

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

Yes, essentially, the State view shows you the tree of objects like you had in the explorer. But, I like State better than Structure :) But, I also like Raw because it goes in comparison with the rest of the presentations of that object: this is the raw presentation, but the others are more refine

Re: [Pharo-dev] First additions to GT-Inspector

+1 Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. On Oct 4, 2014, at 4:22 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > Yes, essentially, the State view shows you the tree of objects like you had > in the ex