Re: [Pharo-dev] Fogbugz feedback - "Image Version"

2017-03-17 Thread Ben Coman
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > I understand why it is useful to you, but it is a PIA for all the rest of > us. > > Consider: > > $ java -version > java version "1.8.0_60" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_60-b27) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (b

Re: [Pharo-dev] Fogbugz feedback - "Image Version"

2017-03-17 Thread denker
> On 17 Mar 2017, at 04:32, Ben Coman wrote: > > A niggle I've had for a while is that the "Image Version" field seems to me > to be useless. > > It defaults to a particular major version. > (that even though only a small thing, is one more thing to maintain) > > It tends to be superseded b

[Pharo-dev] Fogbugz feedback - "Image Version"

2017-03-16 Thread Ben Coman
A niggle I've had for a while is that the "Image Version" field seems to me to be useless. It defaults to a particular major version. (that even though only a small thing, is one more thing to maintain) It tends to be superseded by the Milestone field. The limited selection of major version is t