Re: [Pharo-dev] GitHub CI organization

2015-04-25 Thread Damien Cassou
Sean P. DeNigris writes: > Yes, that's more what I was getting at. Our GitHub organization is > flourishing, but possibly getting a bit overwhelming and I was wondering if > we could unify some of the related repos... I think simplification would not hurt. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou

Re: [Pharo-dev] GitHub CI organization

2015-04-24 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
EstebanLM wrote > because they are not CI, they can be used outside too. Ah, okay. Thanks for the clarification :) EstebanLM wrote > and in a more “deep” answer: because they all born in different moments :) Yes, that's more what I was getting at. Our GitHub organization is flourishing, but po

Re: [Pharo-dev] GitHub CI organization

2015-04-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
because they are not CI, they can be used outside too. and in a more “deep” answer: because they all born in different moments :) Esteban > On 24 Apr 2015, at 14:43, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > I may be missing something, but why are pharo-build-scripts and > pharo-minimal-scripts not in the

[Pharo-dev] GitHub CI organization

2015-04-24 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
I may be missing something, but why are pharo-build-scripts and pharo-minimal-scripts not in the pharo-ci repository? - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/GitHub-CI-organization-tp4821620.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at