Doru
You know well that Glamour has a component model that it not plain smalltalk
model. So why are you telling me I do not know what?
Now you also know that Glamour overuse blocks with multiple optional block
arguments where the order is important.
So I do not undersand why you are saying
Hi Stef,
Glamour does not overuse blocks any more than any caller to cull: does it.
And if you look closely now, you will see that the amount of arguments have
decreased significantly (you do not have to repeat the objects that are
passed in by the transmission for every block). But, blocks are
On 02 Jan 2014, at 14:40, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi Stef,
Glamour does not overuse blocks any more than any caller to cull: does it.
And if you look closely now, you will see that the amount of arguments have
decreased significantly
good to know
(you do not have to
I think that one example Stef has in mind, is the following:
GLMCompositePresentation new
with: [ :a |
a list
display: [ :input | 1 to: input ];
act: [ :list | self halt ] entitled: 'Plip' ];
openOn: 42
what is
Hi Stef,
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:
On 02 Jan 2014, at 14:40, Tudor Girba tu...@tudorgirba.com wrote:
Hi Stef,
Glamour does not overuse blocks any more than any caller to cull: does it.
And if you look closely now, you will see that
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:
On 01 Jan 2014, at 15:02, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote:
The point I apparently failed to make is that I miss the abstraction
above the widget level.
With Spec you have the same as in
