subject:"\[Pharo\-dev\] Language Server Protocol"

Re: [Pharo-dev] Language Server Protocol

2017-02-08 Thread Ben Coman

Hi Stefan, Thanks for your insight. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Stefan Marr wrote: > Hi Ben: > >> On 8 Feb 2017, at 08:01, Ben Coman wrote: >> >> Just a very brief thought, to wonder being a Language Server Protocol client >> might be a path

Re: [Pharo-dev] Language Server Protocol

2017-02-08 Thread p...@highoctane.be

Yes, the protocol first step is about "Documents" What do you think would be the best thing for "Document" besides "ChangeSet"? We can have $root/packagename/classname/[class|instance]/protocol/method.st mapping with method as document but there would be quite a lot.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Language Server Protocol

2017-02-08 Thread Stefan Marr

Hi Ben: > On 8 Feb 2017, at 08:01, Ben Coman wrote: > > Just a very brief thought, to wonder being a Language Server Protocol client > might be a path to polygot programming in Pharo. > Or if providing a LSP server might be a bridge-head > for Pharo to be integrated

[Pharo-dev] Language Server Protocol

2017-02-07 Thread Ben Coman

Just a very brief thought, to wonder being a Language Server Protocol client might be a path to polygot programming in Pharo. Or if providing a LSP server might be a bridge-head for Pharo to be integrated into larger projects. * http://langserver.org/ *