:26 AM
| Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Latest vm on Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS
|
|
| On 23 May 2013, at 19:15, Norbert Hartl wrote:
|
| > Am 23.05.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe
| > :
| >
| >> BTW, 8.04 expired just 2 weeks ago, and Pharo 2.0 was released
| >> before that
Why should they be better suited for "those long term things"?
Norbert
Am 23.05.2013 um 20:10 schrieb "p...@highoctane.be" :
> CentOS may be a better bet for those long term things.
>
> http://centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=5
>
> Or pure Debian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian
CentOS may be a better bet for those long term things.
http://centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=5
Or pure Debian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian (Chart at the bottom)
I am now using Debian for my own stuff FWIW.
Phil
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
You are not old, this the reality of modern software 1% innovation /
improvement, 99% annoyance .
And its definitely not just you and me.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Pharo-dev-Latest-vm-on-Ubuntu-8-04-4-LTS-tp4689467p4689494.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mail
Am 23.05.2013 um 19:23 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>
> On 23 May 2013, at 19:15, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
>> Am 23.05.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>>
>>> BTW, 8.04 expired just 2 weeks ago, and Pharo 2.0 was released before that
>>> ;-)
>>
>> The LTS support expired two w
On 23 May 2013, at 19:15, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> Am 23.05.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>
>> BTW, 8.04 expired just 2 weeks ago, and Pharo 2.0 was released before that
>> ;-)
>
> The LTS support expired two weeks ago. LTS does mostly include security fixes
> not kernel backpo
Am 23.05.2013 um 18:41 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
> BTW, 8.04 expired just 2 weeks ago, and Pharo 2.0 was released before that ;-)
The LTS support expired two weeks ago. LTS does mostly include security fixes
not kernel backports. So installing your 08.04 on a modern machine might not
wor
On 23 May 2013, at 18:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> It comes down to the question: what vm is really needed for 2.0 ?
> If the answer is: you _need_ a pharo vm, then not supporting certain OS
> versions has possibly big repercussions.
Well, I built the image on a newer machine with a phar
On 2013-05-23, at 18:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> On 23 May 2013, at 18:25, Camillo Bruni wrote:
>
>> On 2013-05-23, at 18:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I am trying to run the latest (as in curl -L get.pharo.org | bash) vm on
>>> Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS and it te
On 23 May 2013, at 18:25, Camillo Bruni wrote:
> On 2013-05-23, at 18:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> I am trying to run the latest (as in curl -L get.pharo.org | bash) vm on
>> Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS and it tells me
>
> yes there we have a slight interference with VM and OS ve
On 2013-05-23, at 18:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I am trying to run the latest (as in curl -L get.pharo.org | bash) vm on
> Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS and it tells me
yes there we have a slight interference with VM and OS versions. The best way
to install the VM is to use Damien's PP
Guys,
I am trying to run the latest (as in curl -L get.pharo.org | bash) vm on Ubuntu
8.04.4 LTS and it tells me
$ ldd ./pharo-vm/pharo
./pharo-vm/pharo: /lib32/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by
./pharo-vm/pharo)
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libm.so.6 =>
12 matches
Mail list logo
