Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess equivalent in Pharo7?

Hi Hans, On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 12:14 AM Hans-Martin wrote: > Hello, > I noticed that theOSSubprocess functionality for communicating with OS > subprocesses depends on OSSAttachableFileStream which is a subclass of > deprecated FileStream OSSubprocess works in Pharo7. Yes, we should find a re

[Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess equivalent in Pharo7?

Hello, I noticed that theOSSubprocess functionality for communicating with OS subprocesses depends on OSSAttachableFileStream which is a subclass of deprecated FileStream (incidentally, the project is not marked as being compatible with Pharo7). The popen()/fgetc() based examples in UNIXProcess are

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess 0.2.5 fails in Pharo 6.1 64 bits (macOS)

Yep, OSSubprocess doesn't work on 64 bit VMs at the moment. Eliot, Mariano has indicated he's waiting on https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/pull/142 Do you know of a reason why it shouldn't be merged? Thanks, Alistair On 21 February 2018 at 18:22, phideaux wrote: > When trying the simp

[Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess 0.2.5 fails in Pharo 6.1 64 bits (macOS)

When trying the simple example (ls -la /Users) in Pharo 6.1 64bit you get a talkback because ExternalAddress integerAt:put:size:signed: fails using 'primitiveFFIIntegerAtPut' in module 'SqueakFFIPrims' Something to do with OSSubprocess not accommodating 64 bit pointers perhaps? Same code works f

[Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess for Windows discussion [WAS] Re: [Pharo-users] OSProcess in Pharo 5?

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Ben Coman wrote: > >> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck >> wrote: >> > If you are only interested in Unix / Linux / OSX, >> >> What is the plan for

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubProcess?

Works now! Apparently I had something wrong with FFI. Now it is okay Cheers, Alexandre > On May 5, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > > Hi! > > I tried to use OSSubProcess, but I got an error. I have installed it in the > latest Pharo 5, latest VM, I am running in OSX. > I have ins

[Pharo-dev] OSSubProcess?

Hi! I tried to use OSSubProcess, but I got an error. I have installed it in the latest Pharo 5, latest VM, I am running in OSX. I have installed OSSubProcess from the catalog. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Le 23/01/2016 19:23, Eliot Miranda a écrit : Hi Thierry, On Jan 23, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote: Hi Eliot, Le 23/01/2016 17:04, Eliot Miranda a écrit : Hi Both, Hi Dale, On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote: Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit :

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Hi Thierry, > On Jan 23, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Thierry Goubier > wrote: > > Hi Eliot, > > Le 23/01/2016 17:04, Eliot Miranda a écrit : >> Hi Both, Hi Dale, >> >>> On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Thierry Goubier >>> wrote: >>> >>> Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : Hi Thierry

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Le 23/01/2016 18:42, Gabriel Cotelli a écrit : Well.. If you follow the semantic versioning guidelines the dependency can be done in metacello with the new scripting API like this: github://marianopeck/OSSubprocess:v1.?/repository Yes, this is what I was looking for. But,

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Well.. If you follow the semantic versioning guidelines the dependency can be done in metacello with the new scripting API like this: github://marianopeck/OSSubprocess:v1.?/repository and this will match the newest sub-version, in this way there's no need to update dependent

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Hi Eliot, Le 23/01/2016 17:04, Eliot Miranda a écrit : Hi Both, Hi Dale, On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Thierry Goubier wrote: Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : Hi Thierry, The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha. I don't have a strong opinion. Most of

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Le 23/01/2016 17:17, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Thierry Goubier mailto:thierry.goub...@gmail.com>> wrote: Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : Hi Thierry, The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha.

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Thierry Goubier wrote: > Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : > >> Hi Thierry, >> >> The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha. I don't >> have a strong opinion. Most of the times I am in the similar situation, >> I tend to use

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Hi Both, Hi Dale, > On Jan 23, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Thierry Goubier > wrote: > > Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : >> Hi Thierry, >> >> The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha. I don't >> have a strong opinion. Most of the times I am in the similar situatio

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Le 23/01/2016 15:44, Mariano Martinez Peck a écrit : Hi Thierry, The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha. I don't have a strong opinion. Most of the times I am in the similar situation, I tend to use fixed versions when the projects are really coupled and one cannot work wit

Re: [Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Hi Thierry, The Metacello answer here would be "it's up to you" hahahaha. I don't have a strong opinion. Most of the times I am in the similar situation, I tend to use fixed versions when the projects are really coupled and one cannot work without the other. And use #stable when they are less coup

[Pharo-dev] OSSubprocess use

Hi, I'm looking at OSSubprocess use as a requirement for GitFileTree and I wonder if it is wise to list the dependency on OSSubprocess #stable or to set to a specific version (v0.2)? Thanks, Thierry