[Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-01-23 Thread Torsten Bergmann
Hi Marcus, Ben and others, how can we proceed on META issue https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14447? Anyone with deeper knowdlege of Monticello and the integration process able to help here? It's a merging issue although nothing to merge. Thx T.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-01-23 Thread Ben Coman
What I found is that if the package you are loading does not exist, then prior to the merge Monticello creates the "new" package - presumably so it has something to compare against. (As an aside, if you do not proceed with the merge, then that "new" package remains, which is poor behaviour.) That

Re: [Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-01-23 Thread Ben Coman
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Hi Marcus, Ben and others, > > how can we proceed on META issue https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14447? > > Anyone with deeper knowdlege of Monticello and the integration process > able to help here? It's a merging issue although nothing

Re: [Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-01-24 Thread Ben Coman
How about doing it as a post load script like this (tested on my local package-cache)... oldPackageName := 'ShoutTests'. newPackageName := 'Shout-Tests'. repository := MCRepository allSubInstances detect: [ :repo | repo location = '/Users/ben/Library/Application Support/Pharo/package-cache' ]. " '

Re: [Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-01-24 Thread Ben Coman
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Ben Coman wrote: > How about doing it as a post load script like this (tested on my local > package-cache)... > > oldPackageName := 'ShoutTests'. > newPackageName := 'Shout-Tests'. > repository := MCRepository allSubInstances detect: [ :repo | repo location > = >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Package cleaning

2015-02-09 Thread Marcus Denker
> On 23 Jan 2015, at 13:00, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > > Hi Marcus, Ben and others, > > how can we proceed on META issue https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14447? > > Anyone with deeper knowdlege of Monticello and the integration process > able to help here? It's a merging issue although nothing