Hi nicolas.
No it's not strange.
2 different parsers respond to 2 different syntax and expectations.
To me it's quite clear:
- The SmalltalkNumberParser was there to parse a Smalltalk syntax
(badly named SqNumberParser in the ages...)
It should do this thru Number readSmalltalkSyntaxFrom:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that didn’t
> have any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at some
> point someone needed a bit more functionality, and then different parsers
> were used random
2015-02-06 16:18 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker :
>
> > On 06 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> >
> > We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that
> didn’t have any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at
> some point someone needed a bit more functionali
> On 06 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
>
> We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that didn’t
> have any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at some point
> someone needed a bit more functionality, and then different parsers were used
> rand
We have merged the parsers into one, because we had 3 parsers that didn’t have
any dedicated use-cases, juts were developed historical as at some point
someone needed a bit more functionality, and then different parsers were used
randomly on the system. As for the expression - yes we have to dec
> On 06 Feb 2015, at 09:02, stepharo wrote:
>
>
> Le 5/2/15 10:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman wrote:
>>>
>>> I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the
>>> big picture is.
>>> cheers -ben
>> Of course exponents are st
Le 5/2/15 10:40, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman wrote:
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the big
picture is.
cheers -ben
Of course exponents are still supported ;-)
The discussion is about the + sign for positive expone
> On 05 Feb 2015, at 10:36, Ben Coman wrote:
>
> I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the big
> picture is.
> cheers -ben
Of course exponents are still supported ;-)
The discussion is about the + sign for positive exponents. I am not sure, but I
think that tra
I personally would prefer to be able to use exponents. No sure what the
big picture is.
cheers -ben
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> In Pharo 2.0, the expression "Number readFrom: '2.58500098e+04' "
> would answer 25850
Hi guys,
In Pharo 2.0, the expression "Number readFrom: '2.58500098e+04' "
would answer 25850.01 , but in Pharo 3.0 it answers: 2.58500097
which is a kind of WTF to me.
Checking the differences it seems in Pharo 2.0 ExtendedNumberParser (used
from Number >> readFrom: ) implement
10 matches
Mail list logo
