Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-04 Thread kilon
mediate data into files or a database. With Pharo, I don’t care > about that. > > > > Cheers. > > > > From: Pharo-dev [mailto: > pharo-dev-bounces@.pharo > ] On Behalf Of > Guillermo Polito > Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 2:37 AM > To: Pharo Developm

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-04 Thread Tudor Girba
s or a database. With Pharo, I don’t > care about that. > > ** ** > > Cheers. > > ** ** > > *From:* Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On Behalf > Of *Guillermo Polito > *Sent:* Thursday, October 3, 2013 2:37 AM > > *To:* Pharo

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-04 Thread btc
That's a great quote for marketing Pharo. Thanks Oscar. Oscar EA Callaú wrote: FYI, I don’t have speed problems with such memory. Of course, If I’ll process some big data, I’ll wait a while to get the answer, but the same happens in any other lang/platt. Certainty, I can do fast experiments in

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-03 Thread Oscar EA Callaú
-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Guillermo Polito Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 2:37 AM To: Pharo Development List Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem I can only guess by the comment in the commit: https://gitorious.org/cogvm

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-03 Thread kilon
Talking about GBs it makes me wonder , even if the image allowed more than 500MBs if that would be a wise move. Smalltalk is afterall one of the slowest , execution wise, programming languages. In python which is as slow if not slower, the attitude is to move big data to C libs and then interface

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-03 Thread Guillermo Polito
[mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *On Behalf > Of *Guillermo Polito > *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2013 5:18 AM > *To:* Pharo Development List > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem* > *** > > ** ** > > I think latest Pharo VM support

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-10-02 Thread Oscar EA Callaú
there is no mention the paratemer to change or add. Cheers. From: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Guillermo Polito Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 5:18 AM To: Pharo Development List Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem I

Re: [Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-09-27 Thread Guillermo Polito
I think latest Pharo VM supports to change the memory limit by only changing an ini file. Igor did that not long ago. Cheers, Guille On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Oscar E. A. Callaú wrote: > Hi Guys, > >I read in this thread > > http://forum.world.st/out-of-memory-cog-on-windows-td346562

[Pharo-dev] Pharo (cog) Vm on Windows with 2GB virtual mem

2013-09-27 Thread Oscar E . A . Callaú
Hi Guys, I read in this thread http://forum.world.st/out-of-memory-cog-on-windows-td3465621.html that 512 mb limit can be avoided in windows, but a re-compilation is needed. I was wondering if the situation changed, and now we can pass a parameter. Otherwise, I would be interested if any of