On 31 Jan 2014, at 13:29, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> For instance, I've recently submitted a slice for [1] that adds two new
> methods and a trivial refactoring of one other to Spec's ComposableModel (so
> I can't imagine it would break anything), but in support of discipline on the
> featur
On 31 janv. 2014, at 17:40, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 17:31, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
>
>> Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>>> So… instead following my advice, you people continue submitting and asking
>>> for integration things that are API changes. As a result, instead gaining
On 31 Jan 2014, at 17:31, b...@openinworld.com wrote:
> Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>> So… instead following my advice, you people continue submitting and asking
>> for integration things that are API changes. As a result, instead gaining
>> stability we are loosing it…
>> can you guys please be
Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
So… instead following my advice, you people continue submitting and asking for integration things that are API changes.
As a result, instead gaining stability we are loosing it…
can you guys please be so kind and stop doing what you shouldn’t?
I will ask it again: *no
Thanks Gemini Criquet :)
You are right
On 30 Jan 2014, at 17:11, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> So… instead following my advice, you people continue submitting and asking
> for integration things that are API changes.
> As a result, instead gaining stability we are loosing it…
>
> can you guys
So… instead following my advice, you people continue submitting and asking for
integration things that are API changes.
As a result, instead gaining stability we are loosing it…
can you guys please be so kind and stop doing what you shouldn’t?
I will ask it again: *now* we need to bugfix the u
