Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

ery permutation J). > > I think this is very clear and direct (no magic from parsers etc.). I like > it most for configurations (see everything at a glance) and interface data. > > Best, > Christian > > [1] https://wiki.pdftalk.de/doku.php?id=complexvalues >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

. Juli 2017 09:20 An: Pharo Dev <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax Hi Christian, thanks for the explanation. I see that Values serve a different purpose. We are looking for a compact form of object literal, the is not

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

y be missing? > > HTH, > Christian > > Von: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Im Auftrag von > Norbert Hartl > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Juli 2017 08:14 > An: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Betreff: Re

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

etreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax Hi Christian, Am 03.07.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Christian Haider <christian.hai...@smalltalked-visuals.com <mailto:christian.hai...@smalltalked-visuals.com> >: I solved this with Values[1] for VW and I am very ha

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Christian > > [1] https://wiki.pdftalk.de/doku.php?id=complexvalues > > Von: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Im Auftrag von > Norbert Hartl > Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juli 2017 10:28 > An: Pharo Dev <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > Betreff: Re:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

rgmann [mailto:asta...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juli 2017 21:36 > An: pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org > Cc: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>; > christian.hai...@smalltalked-visuals.com > Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax - porting PDF

towards a Pharo/Squeak version. cheers Von: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Im Auftrag von Ben Coman Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juli 2017 18:54 An: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Torsten Gesendet: Montag, 03. Juli 2017 um 18:54 Uhr Von: "Ben Coman" <b...@openinworld.com> An: "Pharo Development List" <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax Thanks Christian for the open release of pdf4smal

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

t:* Montag, 3. Juli 2017 11:40 > *An:* Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > > *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > interesting ! Maybe you can release your software with an MIT

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

I did Von: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] Im Auftrag von Serge Stinckwich Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juli 2017 11:40 An: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax Hi Christian, inter

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

[mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] *Im Auftrag > von *Norbert Hartl > *Gesendet:* Montag, 3. Juli 2017 10:28 > *An:* Pharo Dev <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> > *Betreff:* Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax > > > > Eliot, > > > > Am

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Hi > > recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they > manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own > implementation and I will switch to DataFrame). > > Now it occurred to me that

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

, 3. Juli 2017 10:28 An: Pharo Dev <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Betreff: Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax Eliot, Am 01.07.2017 um 20:22 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.mira...@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.mira...@gmail.com> >: Hi Norbert, On Jul 1

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Eliot, > Am 01.07.2017 um 20:22 schrieb Eliot Miranda : > > Hi Norbert, > > >> On Jul 1, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: >> >> Am 30.06.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : But what is

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Back from paris ... Eliot I will implement your proposal I like it. Stef On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Thanks all for the suggestions. > I did another version on the version of igor and I will do another > pass on the asObject package > and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Thanks all for the suggestions. I did another version on the version of igor and I will do another pass on the asObject package and send it to you. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > >> On Jul 1, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Norbert Hartl

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Hi Norbert, > On Jul 1, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote: > > >>> Am 30.06.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : >>> >>> But what is DataFrame? >> >> the new collection done by alesnedr from Lviv. It is really nice but >> does not solve

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

> Am 30.06.2017 um 21:14 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : > >> But what is DataFrame? > > the new collection done by alesnedr from Lviv. It is really nice but > does not solve the problem of the compact syntax. > >>> >>> STON fromString: 'Point[10,20]' >>> >> Same goes for

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

2017-06-30 8:28 GMT-03:00 Norbert Hartl : >> Am 30.06.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : >> recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they >> manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own >> implementation and I will

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

> But what is DataFrame? the new collection done by alesnedr from Lviv. It is really nice but does not solve the problem of the compact syntax. >> >> STON fromString: 'Point[10,20]' >> > Same goes for JSON. > >> We were brainstorming with marcus and we could have a first nice extension: >> >> {

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Hi, > Am 30.06.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Stephane Ducasse : > > Hi > > recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they > manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own > implementation and I will switch to DataFrame). > having an abstract

Re: [Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

for fun I implemented asObjectOf: MCSmalltalkhubRepository owner: 'StephaneDucasse' project: 'asObjectOf' user: '' password: '' On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > Hi > > recently I started to read a book on machine learning and

[Pharo-dev] Reflecting on data (literal) object syntax

Hi recently I started to read a book on machine learning and they manipulate dictionary of dictionary. (So I started my own implementation and I will switch to DataFrame). Now it occurred to me that when we program complex objects we do not need a compact literal syntax for our objects. But when