Re: [Pharo-dev] Why doesn't the OSX vm show the name of the running image?

2014-09-04 Thread Tim Mackinnon
Yes - I guess you are right… I suppose the actual difference is that you get 1 icon for something like Finder - and then you can do that wizzy thing where you press a key to show an overview of the different instances and they do show the name of the document. so maybe (and I doubt it would

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why doesn't the OSX vm show the name of the running image?

2014-09-04 Thread Ben Coman
Tim Mackinnon wrote: Yes - I guess you are right… I suppose the actual difference is that you get 1 icon for something like Finder - and then you can do that wizzy thing where you press a key to show an overview of the different instances and they do show the name of the document. so maybe

[Pharo-dev] Why doesn't the OSX vm show the name of the running image?

2014-09-03 Thread Tim Mackinnon
I’m wondering if there is a particular reason why the VM on OSX, just shows the name of the .app file and not the running image? I’ve downloaded the recent 3.0 vm, and used it to launch two images (I set it as the default app and double clicked on 2 different images) - and when you do a

Re: [Pharo-dev] Why doesn't the OSX vm show the name of the running image?

2014-09-03 Thread Ben Coman
Tim Mackinnon wrote: I’m wondering if there is a particular reason why the VM on OSX, just shows the name of the .app file and not the running image? I’ve downloaded the recent 3.0 vm, and used it to launch two images (I set it as the default app and double clicked on 2 different images) -