Hi,
In summary, it seems we should integrate this one.
I resolved the issue to "Resolved (Fix Review Needed)”, but it seems that the
Monkey is still on holidays :). Does anyone know if there is a problem with it?
Cheers,
Doru
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Tudor Girba
> On 05 Jan 2016, at 21:04, stepharo wrote:
>
> All the Inria integration got a problem and this is restarting to work.
> So we will get there.
>
Something is still broken:
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/
all slaves are blocked with threads that are dead.
Marcus
Le 6 janv. 2016 à 08:11, Marcus Denker a écrit :
>
>> On 05 Jan 2016, at 21:04, stepharo wrote:
>>
>> All the Inria integration got a problem and this is restarting to work.
>> So we will get there.
>>
>
> Something is still broken:
>
> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/
>
> all
All the Inria integration got a problem and this is restarting to work.
So we will get there.
Stef
Le 5/1/16 20:38, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
In summary, it seems we should integrate this one.
I resolved the issue to "Resolved (Fix Review Needed)”, but it seems that the
Monkey is still on
Ok. No problem. Please let me know if I can help.
Doru
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 10:04 PM, stepharo wrote:
>
> All the Inria integration got a problem and this is restarting to work.
> So we will get there.
>
> Stef
>
> Le 5/1/16 20:38, Tudor Girba a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> In
Hi,
The VM (both Cog and Spur) supports basic manipulation of objects without
relying on sending messages to those objects. These primitives are meant to be
handled by methods in Context. Eliot provided a changeset with these methods,
and they are not yet in Pharo:
object: anObject basicAt:
Hi Doru,
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The VM (both Cog and Spur) supports basic manipulation of objects without
> relying on sending messages to those objects. These primitives are meant to
> be handled by methods in Context. Eliot
Hi,
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 7:42 PM, Clément Bera wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-01-04 17:35 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> > On Jan 4, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Clément Bera wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is unrelated to Spur /
2016-01-04 17:35 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> > On Jan 4, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Clément Bera wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is unrelated to Spur / SqueakV3 memory manager. The VM support has
> been there and stable for a long time now.
> >
> > I
Hi,
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 6:30 PM, Clément Bera wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is unrelated to Spur / SqueakV3 memory manager. The VM support has been
> there and stable for a long time now.
>
> I tried to add those primitives in Pharo but the problem is that the debugger
Hello,
This is unrelated to Spur / SqueakV3 memory manager. The VM support has
been there and stable for a long time now.
I tried to add those primitives in Pharo but the problem is that the
debugger in Pharo uses EyeInspector whereas the inspectors are done with
Glamour.
Hence, to add support
Thank you Doru!
When do you guess it is going to be integrated in the main codebase?
Esteban A. Maringolo
2016-01-04 12:42 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba :
> Hi,
>
> The VM (both Cog and Spur) supports basic manipulation of objects without
> relying on sending messages to those
12 matches
Mail list logo