Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-03-01 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Workspace serves a particular purpose. I use them, as soon as I depend on them I move it a to a method. However, the main use I have for them is startup scripts or other things I run from the command line. They can't be methods, because they change. Regards! ps: I have to read about the

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-03-01 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.comwrote: Workspace serves a particular purpose. I use them, as soon as I depend on them I move it a to a method. However, the main use I have for them is startup scripts or other things I run from the command line. They

[Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler looks for .st files does the Workpace offer .ws as the default extension? Why not a single extension for Smalltalk files? (.st) and other for chunked content (changesets?) :) Esteban A. Maringolo

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Pharo4Stef
On 28 Feb 2014, at 15:07, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler looks for .st files does the Workpace offer .ws as the default extension? Why not a single extension for Smalltalk files? (.st) and other for chunked

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
I thought so. Esteban A. Maringolo 2014-02-28 18:09 GMT-03:00 Pharo4Stef pharo4s...@free.fr: On 28 Feb 2014, at 15:07, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler looks for .st files does the Workpace offer .ws as the

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Chris Cunningham
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.comwrote: I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler looks for .st files does the Workpace offer .ws as the default extension? Well, the workspace doesn't just use chuck format - in fact, you rarely put

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2014-02-28 18:26 GMT-03:00 Chris Cunningham cunningham...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler looks for .st files does the Workpace offer .ws as the default extension?

Re: [Pharo-dev] ws vs st extensions

2014-02-28 Thread Pharo4Stef
On 01 Mar 2014, at 00:17, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-02-28 18:26 GMT-03:00 Chris Cunningham cunningham...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: I have a naive question... Why if the BasicCodeLoader handler